Physical Contradiction And Ideal Final Result Help To Invent Hit

To succeed in future production and market, it's better to operate with both a physical contradiction and an ideal final result. Specifically, let's consider vehicle suspension system. Physically speaking, the force transmitted from the vehicle suspension to the wheels should be large so that the wheel is well pressed against the road surface and provides traction with it, AND this force should be small so as not to put pressure on the wheel and exclude its impacts on road bumps and potholes. Then TRIZ Ideal Final Result may look like this: an existing suspension system itself (i.e. without adding sensor-processor-motor) while driving will provide big force on the wheel for a smooth road surface and small force on bumps and potholes. Below is an example of a suspension system that brilliantly resolves a physical contradiction. But does not meet the requirements of Ideal Final Result, and so it's difficult and expensive to produce. May next invention of this system be closer to IFR and become a market hit?